fredag den 30. marts 2012

Rococo Day: Shoes

!8th century court shoes often had leather soles, and were made primarily from silk. The tips were pointed and the shoes were heeled. At the time there was no left or right shoe, but the shoes were identical. They then shaped themselves a litttle after the feet of the person wearing them, and so became more comfortable.



1) Yellow silk shoes, France, c.1760s
2) Pink silk shoes, England, c. 1735-1750
3) Embroidered black silk shoes, England, 1780-85
4) Silk shoes, France, c. 1760

torsdag den 29. marts 2012

Wants of the week! (4)



1. SMYTHE smoking jacket from stylebob.com
2. Ring from fantasyjewelrybox.com
3. Leggins brilan from mango.com
4. Pink Pearl bracelet
5. Alexis Bittar Sugar Diamond Kite Earrings
6. Ted Baked shirt
7. Christian Louboutin boots 
8. Seeking Thrift Shopper Earrings

Wedneydays Film Review - Dracula 1931

Dracula 1931


Now, this is of course a horror classic, and therefore I'm a little hesitant at writing a review of this. A negativ opinion might lead to drama. But, it 's not as if I'd have many of those. The principle of this is that I bring you films, which I believe you should bother watching  - either for a cinematic experience or a good laugh at old technology. And in addition I'd just like too apologise for posting this on a sunday.

Main Cast:

Count Dracula: Bela Lugosi
Mina Harker: Helen Chandler
Van Helsing: Edward Van Sloan
John Harker: David Manners
Renfield: Dwight Frye
Lucy: Frances Dade
DR. Seward: Herbert Brunston

The film was directed by Tom Browning and based upon Bram Stokers novel of the same name. 
No, summary seems needed, as I'm quite sure we've all encountered Dracula in some form or another. However, a man named Renfield is making his way through the Carpaithian mountains of 
Transylvannia in a carriege. He and Count Dracula are closing a deal. 
Dracula has leased Cairfax Abbey in England. When Renfield is about to retire for the night, 
he is attacked by Dracula, who turns him in to his slave and gives him a crawing for insects. 
The two now make their way to England. When the ship arrives, it is discovered that 
every single man on the ship is dead, exept a raving Renfield, 
who is found among the cargo by the police. He is now placed in Dr. Sewards sanatorium for mentally ill people. A night Dr. Seward is in the teater with his daugther Mina, his ward Lucy and John Harker. 
There they meet a charming foreign gentlemann, who introduces himself as Count Dracula. 
This man takes an interest in first Lucy, then later in Mina. Meanwhile, bodies a being found all over the city with two holes in their necks. When Lucy is found dead as well, and Mina begins to act strange, Dr. Seward seek the help of Van Helsing, who seems to know exactly what they're dealing with - and how to stop it. The question remains: Who is the vampire? Is it the insane Renfield as the suspect? And more importantly: How do they trap him in time to safe poor Mina?

Well done! Allthough the lighting is disturbing in some parts of the film, the acting is wonderful. Do I have to comment upon Bela Lugosi? Everyone knows he IS Dracula and no one can do it quite like him. Helen Chandler is certainly worth noticing. Her performance differs greatly from the typical lead female roles of the period, as she is not only a pretty face with a loud scream. She gives the character so much more. Mina becomes quite 3d, especially when she is under the spell of  Dracula. The two other major acting performances must be Dwight Frye and Edward Van Sloan. 
Frye fills out the character and gives it such depth, that you dont know whether to laugh at him or cry with him. For Renfield is truly a man torn between his loyalty and obedient affection for his dark master, and his own humanity and care for his fellow man. Half undead, half man.  
Van Sloan dominates the conversations of huge parts of the film, and  his perfomance is brilliant - althought at times a little 2d. All in all, if you haven't seem this - shame on you! Have a nice day. :) 

onsdag den 21. marts 2012

Wedneydays Film Review - M 1931

M


"M"is a German thriller directed by Fritz Lang, and written by Lang a his wife Thea von Harbou. 
It takes place in Berlin, in what appears to be the late 20s. 

Main Cast:

The murderer Hans Beckert: Peter Lorre
Inspector Karl Lohmann: Otto Wernicke   
Der Schränker: Gustaf Gründgens
Mrs. Beckmann: Ellen Widmann  
Elsie Beckmann: Inge Landgut
Inspector Groeber: Theodor Loos
Georg John: Blind ballon salesman
Franz: Friedrich Gnaß

In the beginning we see a group of children standing in a circle. One of the girls leads the other in a song about a child murderer - to much discontent for the parents, as there recently has been a number of murders of little girs. Mrs. Beckmann is waiting for her daughter, Elsie, to come home from school. As Mrs. Beckmann is preparing dinner, we see little Elsie leaving the school. In her hands she has her beloved red ball, which she bounces against a poster pole with a poster about the murders. Suddenly, we hear a voice coming from behind Elsie. A man greats the girl, and politely speaks with him. Suspecting nothing she lets him take her by the hand, and leves with him. Meanwhile, Mrs. Beckmann is getting more and more nervous and calls for Elsie through the window. She eventually goes out to look for her. 
Elsie and the man (whose face we have not yet seen) are walking down the street. They stop by an old blind man selling ballons, and the man buys Elsie a ballon. As they walk on, he begins to whistle "In the hall of the mountainking" by Edvard Grieg. In the next shot we see Elsies ball rolling through grass and the ballon flying away. 
Inspector Lohmann gets a call from his superior urging him to catch this murder, who has been terrorising Berlin. Karl Lohmann organises a nightly raids in the criminal parts of the city, to great anger of the criminals (burglars, prostitutes, robbers, theirs bosses ect.), who are forced to show their papers and have their business made imposible. The police uses fingerprinting and handwriting analysis in order to try to catch the murderer. Meanwhile, the criminals decide that they cannot just sit around waiting for the police to catch him as the raids are costing them money. And as an innkeeper remarks to the police, they would surely kill him themmselves if they saw him, because even the toughest criminals have a soft spot for children. The criminals decide to cath him themselves, inlisting the beggars to watch every street in the city. 
As the police follows the idea that the murderer may have a record in the psykiatric hospitals and seach for him in the archieves, the question remains: Who will catch the killer?    

This film is the stuff legens are made of. If you are in any way interrested in crime, vintage or thrillers, you simply MUST see this. This is Peter Lorres first major film, and the popularity of it made  his career, Especially the monoloque he has at the end upon the reasons for the killings is simply breath taking. Even though the film is old and techniques so far from the modern, it still takes you in. There's not much to say, butt well done to all involved! It is the first of it's kind. This is a masterpiece. Period.